Got this link to Orac's Respectful Insolence via
perceval, for which thanks .
Orac is an oncologist, and has written on the original research, and I'm glad to say, that like me, he seems to think that this information is pointless becasue we don't know who will be affected in which way. Anyway, go and read it. The bit where his piece agrees with me is only a small part of the whole.
ETA: "pointless" is the wrong word, because it's not pointless and someday it may have a point, I just can't think of a better word at the moment.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Orac is an oncologist, and has written on the original research, and I'm glad to say, that like me, he seems to think that this information is pointless becasue we don't know who will be affected in which way. Anyway, go and read it. The bit where his piece agrees with me is only a small part of the whole.
ETA: "pointless" is the wrong word, because it's not pointless and someday it may have a point, I just can't think of a better word at the moment.